Skip to content
Theodora Velli

Shame and avoidance · 5 min read

Why shame makes ADHD avoidance worse

By Theodora Velli · 5 min read · Published

A small task grows a coat

Leo, one of the composite people in the book, has a four-line email to answer. Writing it would take ninety seconds. On the first day it was just a job. Six days later it carried extra weight: it now needed an apology, a reason, and a quiet admission that he had left something this easy undone. The book adds that knowing it is a ninety second job is one reason day six feels worse than day one.

Notice what has happened. The reply is the same size it was on day one. What changed is everything attached to it.

The comeback tax and its biggest line

Once a task or routine drops away, the job itself is seldom all that is waiting when you come back. The book counts the extras: a backlog, lost context, deadlines that passed, messages nobody read, not knowing where things stand, shame about the gap, dread of what you will discover and the urge to come back flawlessly. Together, the book calls these the comeback tax.

Then it says something blunt: shame is the costliest line on the bill.

Shame can set off a short rush of crisis effort. It also makes the whole system something you dread. If opening the planner means hearing a judgment on how capable you are, staying away earns you one more hour without that judgment. The book calls that protection understandable. It also says it raises the tax every day it runs.

What it looked like for Priya

In the book, Priya stops opening her planner after a stressful two-word message from her manager turns out to be a scheduling change. Two days become two weeks. The planner's contents had barely changed. Opening it meant facing all two weeks of quiet in one go, and that quiet talked back, telling her she had come apart over nothing and dropped everything yet again.

The actual tasks needed one evening. Coming back had already used up two weeks.

When she did sit down to restart, the judgment showed up ahead of the tasks: she had wrecked it again, she always does, so why restart if it will all fall apart within a month.

Why punishment does not work

It is tempting to believe shame is the engine of responsibility: if I felt worse about it, I would act. The book disagrees, and Priya is its example. Feeling ashamed did not make her any more responsible. It just made the tax bigger.

The book is careful to say this is not the same as excusing yourself. Excusing yourself makes the consequence disappear. Making the return cheaper takes away friction while the consequence stays visible. Priya still owed answers to the two messages that had gone stale. What she did not owe was two weeks of shame as the price of opening them. In the book's view, a system you keep coming back to does more for accountability than a flawless one you run from.

Replace the verdict with a task definition

The Restart Protocol starts before its first step, with a neutral sentence. The opening thoughts tend to be judgments: I wrecked it, nobody can rely on me, it is always like this. The book's advice is to leave your past alone for now. Priya could use up a whole evening fighting the thought that she always does this, and it would feel like work while getting her nowhere.

Swap the judgment for a description of the job:

The system is currently unavailable. I am restoring a usable state.

Then use facts instead of verdicts. Two people are waiting for my reply gives you something to do. I let everyone down only gives you something to argue with.

Make the first contact small

The book's answer to a swollen task is a smaller start. Leo stopped trying to reply directly. He put on his playlist, opened the thread, wrote one line into a draft, saved it and allowed himself to stop. The line was a holding message with a date in it. Six days of avoidance closed in one short sitting, once he had permission to abandon the line.

You can also write a state note when you stop: Current, Next, Check. It keeps the next return from costing more than this one.

Where this goes wrong

Restart turns into punishment. The point of the Restart Protocol is less uncertainty and less damage. Guilt is not a debt it pays off.

You skip the consequence. Lower the friction, but keep the real consequence in view. Answer the message that aged badly. Pay the bill. Just do it at a size you can manage.

You keep cutting down a task that really needs help. When the fear, the complexity or the risk does not come down, get the right kind of support.

The next action

Say the neutral sentence once. Then name the one thing that costs most if it waits another day, and do a two-minute contact action for it.